MagicRegist is dead!!!

The thing is, i can resist the dmg, but if i resist the dmg, then i should also resist the dispell also.
If the dispell got same MA that its owner is, like HEX said, u should have with SM 5% chance to land dispell, but atm its 100%, talking about Full MA vs full MR. Example templar with MR+AA=3,2k MR against full MA SM 2,2k MA=5% chance to land spells.

 

yeah since its broken.. ignite aether and macig implosion makes dmg equal to removed buffs.. if dmg is 0 it shouldnt remove buffes..
but the other 2 dispel SM have.. they work even 5k MR since they just debuff -> equal to templar taunt(except taunt wasnt have any use on pvp thou).. it cant be resisted.

like arentiga say.. wasnt mater abaut MA.. SM can have 1k MA and still debuff ppl who have 5k MR(not possible thou). when using low lvl dispel or 3k dp dispel.. that how it should be. but when ignite aether or macig implosion.. dmg is resisted.. effect is resisted also

 

SM s dispel is as similar to Fgt taunt the same way an


is similar to a

 

yes i tested it with my spirit master and even if it gets resisted the effect will still aply on the target . However hows on retail ? Can some1 prove how it works there ?

 

If u got proof from retail, show them to HEX, and to others. I am just curious is it like that u claim.

 

QQ for all the cleric.. hahhahhahahahha can't resist the mage's attack.. anyways, im not ABG set.. im only EAT set.. so i admit my weakness.

 

huh wh000t?
I m not trying toprove anything i m just saying that taunt and dispel have nothing in common but maybe u quote the wrong thread

 

Magic resistance isnt made to make you GOD against sorc/sm class,, its simply made to reduce the damage not cut it down totally.. Magic resistance works and stop whining about it....

 

@Gubben ...magic resist doestn reduce the damage you take from magic skills , it only makes it possible to completely resist them . You can still get hit with a 8k glacial shard regardless of how much MR you have.

@everyone else. In retail that is how it is. you can not resist the dispel from SM's. Regardless of you MR , they dont get resisted, here or on retail.

 

I remeber that words - Any debuff carried from a physical skill, can be resisted by MR
in [Update] 02/08/2011

but now,we cant resit physical skill's debuffs! why?!
For example.If　ranger's MA 1200 and My MR 2400,It shoud be able to resist all debuff,but i got stunning...
and,[Update] 16/09/2011 there is not write at MR...

How about think that???

 

I have noticed this too, especially with templars and chanters.

 

Easymode, can proof that? Lets rethink this, so at very first lvl that SM get his 1st dispell, he/she is able to dispell regardless lvl,mr opponents buffs? Sounds quite nonsense to me. If you have proof from this, then accept the fact, but it really sounds nonsense, that lvl 20-30s SMs could dispell anyone, regardless the lvl, mr. This goes to same catecory, that i could hit with lvl 30 sorc against lvl 55 templar, regardless the lvl or mr, when the MR was broken, sounds fishy to me.

 

Dispel is special mechanic , and it SHOULDN t be affected by Magic ressist ... you simply always hit our dispels ...

Some stuns f.e. stunning shot, rupture arrow and others are "psychycal" so therefore you can´t ressist them ...

 

huoh.. read my earlier post..
macig implosion/ignite aether effect should be resisted too if dmg.. still sm have 2 dispel what cant be resisted.. low lvl one and DP skill

 

>>I have noticed this too, especially with templars and chanters.

yes...now,we cant resist templar's capture skill　XDDD
and, why that skill dependence to pysical ACC...It must be dependence to MA if true.......

 

since its physical effect.. xD like knockback.. ahh yeah you can dodge it.. or even when having shield(stoneskin etc) it wasnt pull target.