Is this normal for a Gladiator?

yes it does that why GOOD PC & internet OWNS Sucky PC & Internet

 

It does if you have a really high ping meaning like 400 ping rather than 70.

 

For the record, I have 59ms ping.

Edit: I also have a polearm and I still managed to pull it off once. Pretty sure with a Greatsword I could do it close to every time.

 

No matter how good a weaver you are, there is always a delay between the auto attack and the skill, it is not a large delay, but it is long enough to render 3 attacks in one second impossible.

I surrender. My braincells are committing seppuku en masse just from TRYING to understand your "argument"

 

and who's arguing who btw?

 

Although, to explain how lag effects atk speed:

if for example your atk speed is 2.5, you can attack once every 2.5 seconds
If your ping is 400MS, you will probably only attack once every 3 seconds
If your ping is 0MS=BEST PING POSSIBLE, you will still only be able to attack once every 2.5 seconds.

 

You told me my english wasnt good but this is a runon sentence and the last part doesnt make sense. "it is not a large delay, but it is long enough to render 3 attacks in one second impossible." Did you mean it is impossible?

 

No english / grammar crap in this thread bro. That shit stays in school and professional work.

Its a game forum, no one gives a flying **** about it until it is not readable.

Also, a good weaver can pull off a skill the moment his attack animation begins to make that delay non existent.

 

..................

 

You know, if you want to play the grammar nazi game, make sure you can write "wasn't" properly.

And if we're using formal speech than you should not write "wasn't" in the first place. Try "was not", instead.


And use "Does not" instead of "doesnt".

 

When there is a contraction available it doesnt matter which one you use. We're or we are. Doesnt or does not it does not matter which one you use. You can use either.


BTW I was pointing out your mistakes when it did it make sense.

for example when you said this runon sentence that made it not make sense when you ended the sentence with impossible.

 

Yeah Pwnzor, I'm not on your side on this one.

 

We both agree that the guy that was frowned apon for having 3 attacks at once isnt a hacker therefore you are on my side. But your not on my side for this "grammar war" right?

 

You mean "doesn't".

And contractions are very informal. Just like comma splices.

 

Who said anything about being formal or not?I just corrected you on your sentence that doesnt make any sense which you keep avoiding when I posted your quote twice. Would you like me to post it again for you?

 

veryyyyyy funny....

 

Well since you requested, I will break it down for you. Pay attention, this is REALLY COMPLEX SHIT

"No matter how good a weaver you are there is always a delay between the auto attack and the skill," : Self explanatory, reasoning behind this is human reaction time and lag, as well as other factors.

"it is not a large delay," : "It" is of course referring to the delay, the purpose of this comma slice is to explain that the delay is not noticeable by human standards

"but it is long enough to render 3 attacks in one second impossible." : "It" is again referring to the delay between the auto attack and the skill, which is the process of weaving, and this part of the sentence is stating that it is impossible to pull off 3 attacks in 1 second.

Now you seem to have an issue because I ended the sentence with "impossible". "Rendering something impossible" is, I believe, a phrase in the english language, so I have no idea why you should soil your pants just because I made use of it.

---------- Post added at 02:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:53 AM ----------

Speaking of run-on sentences...

 

exactly. It is a phrase which is my problem. Make it a complete sentence otherwise it doesnt make sense because at the beginning you said it IS long enough to render 3 attacks in one second then you said impossible. There should of been a period after "second" otherwise I dont get if you are saying that it is possible or not possible because at the beginning you said it is long enough and at the end you say impossible.

---------- Post added at 08:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:59 PM ----------

I am pretty sure you did the same thing right here too. You should of added an "it is" before the impossible for it to make sense. This one is a little more easier to understand then the previous one where you made the same mistake but still, I see what your problem is.

 

I rest my case. You fail at the english language.

"The delay is long enough to render 3 hits in one second impossible/an impossible feat"

=

"The blow was strong enough to render him unconscious"

=

"This idiot has almost, but not quite, rendered me speechless".

---------- Post added at 03:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:03 AM ----------

And for the love of all things I hold sacred, IT'S "SHOULD HAVE" NOT "SHOULD OF"