Radar Hack

Ok.
The Gms of gamezaion love ban hackers but.
If u use all-see when your Chat box said "someone used Hide 2" and you get banned.

Can we trust in GMs ?
Is safe donate for his server ?

Look that: http://forum.gameznetwork.com/showthread.php/58333-We-dont-radar-hack!!!

Can you call this peoples hack because they AOE randon places when someone used hide?

 

i have screenshot of you saying "GM"!, when i teleported to you. with Invisible status.

 

LoL
Is bannable say GM ?

 

hi. I am Gretel. The log that < AM>twilightgirl blocked my AOE. It was seen and he said the "GM".
We hope for the true judgment to the game master.
thx.

 

there is no such thing as "random AoE" in an empty place without enemies around. It may be not you who used radar but someone in your group that guided you. In that case you can only blame that person that used you.

P.S. I saw many radar users, yet i only caught 3-4 of them during my AM days because its hard to get decent proof of them hacking.

 

Uhm you'r wrong, Twilightgirl was in the //see mode, and she didnt see any sins.

 

Well.. Allow me to clear things up

I got 10 Reports of the same two persons. So I obviously went to check that.
Surprisingly, as soon as I ported there invisible, They used a random AOE Skill and then other 2, Just to check if my HP dropped and ofc to take me out of my "stealth" . . However I'm not on "stealth", and I don't have a skill log for that, since it's a command.
Afterwards, when they saw my HP wasn't going down, They said "oh, it's a GM".

Like Asanka said "there isn't such thing as Random AOE Spells".

And about that assasin you say, I was there, and what's more, In //see status. . and I couldn't see Anyone in a 100m Radius. . . And ofc that log could be scrolled up to prove something. . .

So. . It should be a HUGE coincidence then.
The fact that 10 ppl reported you for using radar hack.
The fact that when I ported to you you guys started to use AOE spells
The fact that when Icedearth ported to you awell said "hi GM"

I'm still going with my decission, and take into account that I never ban someone unless I'm completely sure he's hacking. . and this time you were really obvious. .

 

So where not aloud to make a seprat chat window thats shows when an enemy cast any skills?

 

You'r allowed to.

 

We are not looking at the <AM>Twilightgirl.
"<AM>Twilightgirl blocked the attack of Gretel in the effect of the barrier."
This log was seen.
I used Seismic Wave.
http://www.aiondatabase.com/skill/286/-iii
This skill doesn't need the target.
Even if the enemy race in the range is doing Hide, the attack is hit.

We dont radar hack.

Default size img
http/img638.imageshack.us/img638/5923/aion007603.jpg

 

Try to check again

hi GM's.
Please check　SS again.

This SS is japanese. Im JPN.

I can see "twilightgirl is the barrier effect, blocked gretel attacks" on the upper right.Written in white.
They could see the log. so they said "GM".
They can't see GM. and Not visible on radar.

Do not people read　JPN logs?


I think see mode's bug.
Please reproduce the same situation.
You should get a blocked log by see mode.
You'll find that truth.


Also...Asanka wrong, glad have non target AOE skills.
What do you guys that have played　glad?
Course Chanter doesn't use skills.

I hope truth.

 

except for glads... they can use aoe even without enemy around

 

i guess gm's arent dump as u think, even sometimes they piss me just give proper report and they gonna deal with it.

 

i think this is not radar hack
its just normal radar, he saw there is a sin using stealth and he maybe used tremor skill (aoe chanter skill )

 

thanks read

yes. they dont use rader hack.
but chanter does not use skill.

I want not mistake the　"they can see the GM blocked log. so said GM" and " glad have non target AOE skills"

 

Please look at the screen shot again.

Seismic Wave.
http://www.aiondatabase.com/skill/286/-iii
This skill doesn't need the target.
Even if the enemy race in the range is doing Hide, the attack is hit.

I am Japanese. Sorry...I am not good at English.
Can my word be understood?
I am uneasy.
And, it is sad.

Gretel

Default size img
http/img638.imageshack.us/img638/5923/aion007603.jpg

 

If u told to gm before "Teleport to Rizai" this will not happen if u are not using and Rizai sin exist , i'm a sin and i now is easy to detect if i use skills and someone is near , because the range of the log is much much grater then radar and if a player have radar i think they see the name and using skills on <AM>Player just a stupid kid will do ( i saw on youtube ).
Was a asmo general Archer in top 6-7 i'm not sure who because i don't see him anymore (banned or name change) , killed me many times after i was in shadow 3 min and no skills used by me ,but he still detect me and one time i was targeting him and i saw no eye and he come and put a trap on me ( i was siting down in shadow walk for almost 4 min). so if u wanna catch radar users use a normal name and start with the top players bc is hard to go there without some skills and a lot of time playing maybe some have a "help"

 

Raazzil made this pretty clear, but I'll try to reword what she said.

GMs do not use a Hide skill. We have a command called //invis, which puts us in an invisible state, and nothing shows up in any logs, including our own. Twilightgirl warped to you after you were reported, in which case nothing would've shown up in your log. Your own arrow #4 shows that Gretel managed to hit Twilightgirl even though she was invisible, meaning that you must have seen her using a radar hack.

Also, Rizai was nowhere near since we also have a command called //see, which allows us to see anybody that is in Hide. Nobody else was on the screen.

Unless you have further evidence, you will remain banned.

 

Post here you'r chat.log if it's vaild i will unbanned you.

 

The range where hidelog flows is wide.
The appearance appears if AOE is hit even if hide is done.
If it is Gladiator, it is natural to use AOE even if the appearance is not seen.
If the system of AION is understood, it doesn't become such a judgment.
I am regrettable.