[Lumiel] Cast Your Votes Who Want to Close The Shields of Terminon and Premium

...5$ brain for sell /w right now.......btw Internal server Error because of .....

 

I'm getting internal server errors switching to pages 2 & 3 wth...

 

CLOSE the shield )

 

thank you scrappydoo this is the time for the shield goes off

 

i like to pvp on the ground in gelk and belu but sometimes i feel like air pvp and the core gets boring going around and around, i miss the days when you could raid tem and prem, was so fun :3

 

Nope, leave the shields, there are low lvl that need a safe spot or low geared players that w8 to hear that in core is their faction.

 

its a close fight...

 

First of all fix the wall hit bug and then turn it off.
end of story

 

Fixed up error

 

thanks fynie

 

mmm, the taste of zerg.

I'm having mixed feelings about this. :\ Maybe I shouldn't regret accidentally voting 'no'. Teminon and Primum are supposed to be safe havens...if it's closed down, there will be nothing but zerg after zerg ><

 

Agree completely with this. You're not encouraging PVP by attacking people while they're preparing to go elsewhere and fight. And you can hardly go invade Primum/Teminon without a zerg.

 

No. Just No. if you're even remotely thinking about withdrawing the shields, then you've obviously no idea what has happened before. Don't mess with what isnt broken. Focus on fixing things rather than breaking things which work correctly.

 

so you like gelkm/inggi ....100vs100,lag vs lag,..AOE spam....etc etc?they need to create more battlefields for players in order to taste a new fight(old and new ..i am sure they got bored to see same crap

 

That's not called 'creating a new battlefield', that's called 'making more zergs'. That can't benefit us. :\

Group vs group battles are fine, but a continent vs continent? This'll just make ing and gelk look like kiddie rides.

 

give this to seil too nao

 

you dont get it >>all players from Gamez are in Inggi because they dont have where to pvp ...i mean Balaurea is the only place where you can pvp ./rifts are useless/abyss is boring without Primum/Teminon>

 

Pretty much in complete and total agreement with those whom voted No. Heard stories of when the shield was turned off and it was a Zerg Fest of Lmao/stupidity proportions. This will not promote "more" PvPing, what will promote more players to PvP is by simply updating the server and fixing the things that aren't correct which will draw more players, which in turn will allow greater scenarios of PvP.

Simply removing shields for Term and Pan is not going to allow a greater diversity of PvPing, your going to get 20394823094238 Elyos or Asmos sitting there waiting for someone to simply log on and destroying them while they are trying to do something other then PvP, and not expecting a 20 vs 1 onslaught. We've seen how ridiculous these things can get already with the current situation in Heiron, and Belu. This isn't going to improve PvPing, all its going to do is allow more 20 vs 1-5 unsuspecting players who had other plans other then getting mobbed by an army of ants.

Considering that these two places are there as a haven to prevent such things, not to mention the fact that there are a lot of factors to consider that would devalue the situation all for the sake of more situations for "pvping".

Terrible idea and absolutely does not need to not be implemented, fix other facets of the games that are more relevant please (Like Alliance).

 

Oh and yea forgot something
>>When shields were OFF Balaurea was unknown in Gamez(i think ..sorry if i am wrong) oh oh...and if someone from Gamez staff made a poll then we all know Evilset want to turn off shilds (we all know he make polls because he want to see how you react)

 

Actually, I prefer rifts/core more than ing/gelk, tbh. I'm rarely in balaurea when there are zergs. If anything, I just go to gelk and engage a few asmos there. If we get rid of the shields in temi/primum, then we're basically kissing any form of safety in abyss goodbye. I'd see people cringing from reshanta altogether.