AM Daaxie, pls read this

another thread?

wew............................. they haven't posting those legit logs...................... the end for your LEGION?

 

He'll be called the God of Templars

 

agree with daaxie... just provide thats chat log then finish,why you guys need you shout all the time?
simple fact,cant provide means cheat or hide something...

 

Disregarding the fact that the chat logs don't work for all people, it's a flimsy method of proof anyhow. It's a text file. /edit

 

yeah indeed , but its still a bit of evidence that i need.

 

wew.....hes not playing aion 24/7...he has some life to do also...he plays whith his free tym....maybe he is at work now.................

 

I understand it , thats why i said i am still waiting for it . And whenever he has time he can do it.

 

zzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzz

 

So its a bannable offense to use zikels shield?
Just wanna know cause im temp with full abg and i wanna avoid this >.>

 

Is bannable if you use full abg templar...LOL

 

would u mind keeping this kind of answers to urself and stop spamming here?

 

Ok i will keep my answers for myself and i will stop spamming here.

 

Can you explain me how a Chanter only does 1-2 crit damage on a templar without buffs?

 

Maybe that CHanter has CRAPPY ARMORS( green,blue) and a Stupid wep..(and of course maybe the templar used barricade -but no proof

 

how do u know? have u seen his armors? x.x


nvm >.>

 

Edited ...

 

Hmm parry also lessens attack damage taken like what I've noticed in the pic his attack went in got parried and inflicted 1 damage also is screenshot enough as a evidence? not to mention there's only a few pics of him the moment where he had a buff, the moment he died, and the moment he blocked(the last pic) but he was not already there. Also it's quite weird that you're banning someone and then you ask him evidence to prove his innocence which in the case you should've presented a clear evidence yourself that he did that and these, and not a half baked evidence. As a person with authority you could've just presented all the evidence you have to shut his mouth off. Also there are a lot of factors that should have been considered like he probably using a block MS which in this case could be checked by going through his inventory and check it.
If you guys have the evidence to prove his guilt then that should be presented clear and not tampered. Least that would probably stop their QQing. /Just my 2 cents.

 

rarely AM always ask for proff... before the banned so AM/GM ban without proff... where is the evidence to ban him?? or maybe he is an elyos= (ban without evidence)????

 

you are DUMB WITH EVIDENCE

 

agreed.......how come they ask for evidence after banning this guy.....they dont have evidence why they banned him??? show chatlogs gm to show your legitimacy of banning him.....they only ban him because of ss,and don't ask accuser to show chatlog to prove his accusation valid?.......