O_O'

Like this? Its too bad I couldn't share the rest of the pic. Its quite lovely.

 

[video=vimeo;24750006]http/vimeo.com/24750006[/video]

 

e.e There was this firefox add on that allowed you to block an image so you'd never see it again.

That's what I did to Aegis' sig. Though.. Aegis sig did have some dude pulling his underwear off.. lol. I mean, that's all he was wearing, seems a bit inappropriate. Even if it were some hot girl, if all she had on was a pair of good looking undies while showing off a perfectly toned body, it would be removed too. It's not a religious issue at all, or somebody being sexually insecure. Like I saw some peeps saying. Somethings are just not appropriate for kids to see. I'm sure aegis doesn't go around showing his young cousins pictures of good looking men with underwear on, or good looking girls-doesn't matter. Unless he does.

 

I am a prod bi-sexual female, problems????
Call me 666 now.

 

Remember that guy who had a boob-bouncing babe as his avatar? I don't remember anybody complaining.

 

trustsonnys avatar is ........

 

I reported it. All of them. Scyth, and when Aegis had the girl with the grey shirt and melons. It's not a gender issue.

 

after i read this, my eye's went straight to your sexy sig.

 

Go on, TrustSonny needs to infract him/herself also.

 

You might stick to what you actually think is fair for the forum, but most people that are against his sig are against it in a very hypocritical manner.

Also, @Ghost: *****es dont know 'bout my trap threads.

 

I have, but what do you expect me to do? Only person who would do anything is xxxBeast, and now he's gone. Last thing we can do is speak our minds.

 

Wth are u guys saying?? lol
Do you realize i was only kidding? o.o'
If i really cared i'd at least post it in a diffirent section , jeez.
w/e

 

Then wouldn't the staff be hypocritical in removing Aegis's sig?

For f-ck's sake, just disable avatar and sig options until they realize that. Done.

 

Its okie, Its okie..

I made Aegis a new sig.

 

thats what im talking about ;D

 

LOFL



10charrrrrrrrr

 

I do, but I respect your opinion, and those that are here also. I just don't agree with showing certain content in a forum that's not even 13+ req. It's open for anyone. Like I said, it's not a gender issue, or religious, but more of an ethical.

My last post about this. D= You've heard me. GL irritating angry insecure kids here, but you won't have me. D;

@Ghost: Sure it's hypocritical, but when hasn't the staff been that way? Why do you keep pointing that same arguement at me as if I were part of it? I'm not. I came on a neutral standpoint.

 

Tell me you weren't the one to create the sig i just saw in the character creation izzue thread XDDDD

 

I like how you inhabit the forum just to argue with forum members.... Seriously.. Pick a fight worth fighting over.. and stop turning this into a rage thread... PETRO WAS JOKING...

Edit: Nope its this one ... http://i53.tinypic.com/ixs2ux.png

 

More than just Beast would do something about it, ie: Sanctus, Autumn, Edi, Albull, etc., but right now fairness doesn't factor into it, because the fact of the matter is, signatures are NOT being moderated that much. I normally ignore it, because theres nothing I can do about it and in the end everyone on these forums has made a decision to browse it and its content. However, right now the issue is that a lot of people are being hypocritical wanting Aegis' sig removed when they might themselves support people who use sigs like it but for a female. You aren't one of these people of course, but a majority of people complaining about sigs at all ARE like that, and if Aegis' signature was removed because of it then that would be blatant abuse and favoritism. Right now we can at least rest assured that the mods are being fair with signatures (or so I've seen anyway).