Camping Silentera Exit

Chronicheals, about the post Camping at the protected area in Gelkmaros:

Protected Area Campers - Gelkmaros - YouTube

I think is fair to mention that one of our legion members (Redroxpv) got jailed for 6 hours online for doing the same those asmos players were doing in Mitrakand.
So maybe you guys need to discuss and make that specific point (among others) more clear, also Puddles today said we can't attack in those areas in Inggison.
So why asmos can and we don't.
I don't want to flame or anything.... but it is not fair.
Please decide ! So if it is allowed so it is for everyone.

 

The videos were posted, I even did one too ...

the asmos seem to only have privileges in this game, so do not give.

 

I said : ASMOS IN GAMEZ IS OVER PROTECTION

All Am´s play a asmos. Never has anything wrong,All videos are bad,when the group bug just elyos side bug asmos work fine.

 

I remember a while back people complaining about all the Gm's being Elyos. In reality, it's really a silly thought. GM's have both Asmo and Elyos characters, there's no silly "racism" going on whatsoever.

 

I agree with you Terrorized about the "racism".
However, the main point here are: Server Rules and Staff Decision.
One put a player 6 hours jailed for attacking asmos at the Silentera exit at Jotun Ruins in Ingisson and other GM said is ok for asmos doing that in Mitrakand.
As I said Puddles also said we can't do that..... so they need to decide.
By the way ... I guess it is already decided.... IT IS ALLOWED TO ATTACK AT THE SILENTERA EXITS.... if a AM or GM jails you, just make a reference at Chronicheals post and you'll certainly freed.

 

Was Chronic the one who jailed your Legion mate? For each GM may have their own views of what's punishable, or what's not. Chronic may not consider this jail-able, whereas another GM could have a different view of it.

 

Sorry...... but it doesn't make any sense to me the same action has two different judgements by the same team.
So if its not an offense then it is not.

 

Assassins do this.. you have low hp and you move then BOOM! double dead

 

ok?
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

 

asmo do this , elyos do it to ... bah stop complaining it's the same thing as zerging...and you CAN'T STOP zerging / camping , i think i saw 100+ threads simillar to this one

 

You should just report it than bringing ur friend getting jailed up. I have screenshotted an osbruxos twice for camping, but I didnt bother posting coz I killed him anyway. And I think it was redrox/tohuvabohu/topadhina/ idk any ranger in osbruxos.

 

easy for a dev to just ad a guard tower hitting ppl with 10k or an actual ranged npc hitting guys.
just sad to see that some noobs need to camp kisk to get kills or ap.. kinda ruins the game just like zerging does. game would be more fun if the battles were open and spread out

 

i didint get it...what is not fair? just report them and they will get jail...u think gms are always there?
i've reported your members so many times but i didnt make any thread about this...just some ss
no offence but everyone knows that osbruxos members are the nr.1 campers

 

LOL the topic is going off as usual....
The point is Redroxpv was jailed for camping in Silentera exit the players in the video not.
Puddles and Vildiill said it is not allowed camp the kisks at the exits and Chronicheals said it is allowed, period.
I don't care if Os Bruxos, KnockOut or Redvius are camping...... but server rules can't be "changed" like this.
This topic won't even be necessary if the portals at the entrance were working correctly.
Ayway... just close the topic, as I said the decision was already posted by Chronicheals it is allowed to camp kisks at Silentera Exits and players (both elyos and asmos) can't be jailed for that anymore.
Please close the topic.

 

Okey, so ban all the ppl on sieges, couse the are camping us at the fortress entrance LoL

this topic has no sence at all xd

 

LOL PoWell indeed... what you said has no sense, since the topic is about how can GMs diverge like that once the server rules must be the same for all players and NOT about who, where or when is camping.

Please close the topic..... it will become a flame very soon and I guess it is clear enough that Chronicheals decision makes the camping possible at Silentera Exists.
PLEASE CLOSE THE TOPIC.

 

erhm even though this isn't my hoby, camping a kisk should be allowed everyone places kisks at their own risk let's say, so if you place a kisk in a obvious area people can choose to destroy it or camp it, it's up to the players to hide their kisks, if not you can always go back to the obelisk in town. If it was obelisk camping, well yeah thats lame and shouldn't be allowed, but kisk camping? who gives a flying ....

 

What i've said, was ironic..

TribalSoul is completly right. Obelisk have lot of guards that protect the spawn (at least they should..) but kisks must be setted on strategic spot, obviolsy hiden.

Anyways silentera is not a place where you can set a kisk, couse its supose to not allow enter ppl anytime (here is customized to have more pvp), but at SC entrance, is impossible to acces for the oposite faction, so there is no spawn protection needed. The camp on the hill its just same that camping at entrance of a fort..

 

Again... in general the problem is not kisk camping.
The problem is one player was jailed 6 hours for kisk camping at one of Silentera Exists at Jotuns Ruins because a GM said it's not allowed.
The same happened as showed in the video and GM said it is allowed and players wouldn't be jailed.

Why one player got jailed and the other not if the action is exactly the same ?

 

redprox? more like badprox.