Ranger VS ATK manastones

I've been conflicting with the attack rate of my ranger lately, and it seems most rangers land more damage to the same type of attack I use. I have fill HP + crit manastones, and my attack is at least 475.

My question is, would Attack manastones at least help with the damage rate?

 

yes it will i think, u can get a pretty nice crit rate with food, scroll and your buff
i think added atk manastore will help you do it =)

 

You never need more than 440-480 base crit, if you eat food and use scroll to beef up crit. Now problem with atk stones is that the additional attack manastone damage is calculated AFTER weapon bonus, crit modifiers and skill adds.

So if you stack 20 +5 atk manastones, you'll only hit for about 50-100 damage harder per hit, no matter what.

Honestly it's hard to justify +atk, when you consider how much damage you lose if you get parried or blocked. The more accuracy you have, the lower chance your enemy has to parry or block your attack. When you get blocked by a cleric or a templar, your damage is cut down by about 70 percent.

So what's better in your opinion? +50 or 100 damage per hit, or avoiding the 70% block damage reduction?

Just something to think about.

 

so your sayin to go Hp / crit / acc? or hp / crit / macc?